re issue#20 encourage use of detached payloads for proof formats #28
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
It seems like a generaly strong and useful property that proof formats require that the payload be re-constructed from the proof prior to signature verification This change adds a single scentence to the example inclusion proof to encourage this.
OR13
approved these changes
Aug 6, 2024
SteveLasker
reviewed
Aug 6, 2024
Co-authored-by: Steve Lasker <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It seems like a generaly strong and useful property that proof formats require that the payload be re-constructed from the proof prior to signature verification
This change adds a single scentence to the example inclusion proof to encourage this.